Fordel StudiosCursor is rolling out a new kind of agentic coding tool
What Happened
Called Automations, the new system gives users a way to automatically launch agents within their coding environment, triggered by a new addition to the codebase, a Slack message, or a simple timer.
Our Take
Honestly? Automations in your IDE sound great until Slack messages start triggering agent runs while you're mid-debugging. Cursor's solving a real scatter problem (agents live everywhere), but the UX here feels like we learned nothing from chaos.
The real issue: unintended triggers. You mention a refactor casually in Slack, agent ships code, you're back in the fire. You're not buying automation, you're buying technical debt with a better GUI.
Skip this until there's a "kill all agents" button that actually works.
What To Do
Wait for a stable kill-switch before enabling Slack triggers in your workflow.
Builder's Brief
What Skeptics Say
Event-triggered agents that respond to Slack messages and codebase changes operate with broad repo access and minimal audit trails — teams without explicit permission scoping will accumulate unreviewed AI-generated commits. The framing as 'automation' normalizes agent writes to main without addressing the security and review debt this creates.
Cited By
React
Get the weekly AI digest
The stories that matter, with a builder's perspective. Every Thursday.