Skip to main content
Back to Pulse
data-backedSlow BurnArc: Ai Regulation Us (ch. 17)
TechCrunch

AI companies are spending millions to thwart this former tech exec’s congressional bid

Read the full articleAI companies are spending millions to thwart this former tech exec’s congressional bid on TechCrunch

What Happened

A tech billionaire-backed super PAC is spending $125 million to undercut candidates pushing for AI regulation. New York's Alex Bores, a former tech executive himself, is one of them.

Our Take

$125M to kill a candidate isn't some backroom deal—it's regulatory capture with the lights on. Alex Bores isn't fringe; he's an actual tech exec pushing real rules, and the PAC's basically saying we'll just outspend him. That's legal. That's the whole problem.

This isn't corruption. It's worse. It's the system working exactly as designed, and everyone's fine with it. Billionaire money + citizen regulation = predictable outcome. Vote him or don't, but pretending we can have sensible AI policy while this is happening is cope.

What To Do

Research Bores' actual proposals—if they're reasonable, talk about them.

Builder's Brief

Who

policy and legal teams at AI companies with US operations

What changes

regulatory risk calculus shifts depending on election outcomes; compliance posture may need updating

When

months

Watch for

House or Senate AI-specific bills advancing to committee vote after midterm results

What Skeptics Say

$125M targeting a single candidate is an overreaction that draws more scrutiny to AI political spending than it deflects; historically, aggressive corporate lobbying against regulation accelerates the oversight it tries to prevent by making the threat legible to voters and legislators.

Cited By

React

Newsletter

Get the weekly AI digest

The stories that matter, with a builder's perspective. Every Thursday.

Loading comments...